Guide
Broker, licensing consultant, patent attorney, or commercialization firm: who does what, and what will each not do?
A patent attorney or agent handles the legal work, a broker sells patents to buyers in its network, a licensing consultant usually advises on strategy or valuation for a project, and a commercialization firm does the commercial work of defining the product, finding who pays, and getting the owner into the room. Most owners need counsel plus one of the others, and the right one depends on whether you want a sale, a licensing program, or a product someone can pitch.
All guidesUpdated
The labels in this market are loose. The same firm can call itself a broker on one page and a consultant on another, and owners searching for help find law firms, brokers, analytics vendors, marketplaces, and invention promoters all answering the same question. The result is that owners hire the wrong kind of help for the job they actually have.
This guide defines each category by what it does and, just as usefully, by what it will not do. It names no firm. Categories are enough to make the choice, and once you know the category, you can judge any firm inside it on its own published terms.
What does a patent attorney or patent agent do?
Patent attorneys and agents registered with the USPTO prepare and prosecute applications, and patent attorneys also give legal opinions, draft and negotiate licenses, and handle disputes. They own every legal question about the claims: what they cover, whether they are valid, and how to protect them.
Your counsel is the one professional every owner needs, whichever other help you choose. Counsel drafts and closes every license and sale, and a commercial partner who tries to do that work is a warning sign. What counsel usually does not do is the commercial work: deciding who would buy the technology, building the pitch, and running outreach. Many attorneys say so plainly, which is why owners ask them who to call.
Lawyers are also bound by professional rules on sharing fees and paying for referrals, which shapes how they work with commercial firms. A referral from counsel to a commercial firm is normally just that, a referral.
- Does: prosecution, continuations, claim construction, validity and infringement opinions, license drafting, disputes.
- Will not do, as a rule: find buyers, define a product, or run commercial outreach.
Sourced facts
The USPTO tells inventors to engage a practitioner, attorney or agent, registered to practice before the USPTO for patent application filings, because not everyone is eligible to represent them.
Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Scam Prevention. Checked .
ABA Model Rule 5.4(a) begins: a lawyer or law firm shall not share legal fees with a nonlawyer, subject to the exceptions the rule lists.
Source: American Bar Association, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.4: Professional Independence of a Lawyer. Checked .
What does a patent broker do?
A broker sells patents on behalf of owners, to buyers in its network, and is usually paid when a sale closes. Brokers are strongest for families of patents with evidence of use, offered by owners who want a sale.
A good broker brings two things an owner cannot easily build: a network of active buyers and a feel for what those buyers want this year. The cost of that model is selectivity. Brokers decline most of what they see, and most packages listed in the brokered market have not sold.
- Does: screens assets, packages them for sale, markets them to its buyer network, negotiates the sale.
- Will not do, as a rule: take single patents with no evidence of use, run a licensing program, or define a product.
Sourced facts
In 2016, it was estimated that only 21% of brokered patent packages brought to market sell.
Source: Wikipedia, Intellectual property brokering. Checked .
What does a patent licensing consultant do?
The label covers a wide range: strategy and valuation specialists, former licensing executives working independently, and expert witnesses on royalties. Most are engaged per project or on retainer to advise, and most stop at the recommendation.
Licensing consultants are valuable when the question is analytical: what a portfolio is worth, how to structure a program, what royalty a court or a counterparty might accept. Many serve large companies and litigation, and their engagements are sized to match. Ask any consultant what they deliver in writing, whether they will talk to buyers on your behalf, and who carries the work after the report.
- Does: valuation, licensing strategy, program design, royalty analysis, sometimes expert testimony.
- Will not do, as a rule: run outreach to licensees or stay through the deal.
What does a patent commercialization firm do?
A commercialization firm does the commercial work around a granted patent: what the product is, who would pay for it, which licensees or buyers fit, and how to get the owner into the room with them. The good ones deliver in writing, keep the owner's title, and leave the legal work to counsel.
This is the least defined category, and the one with the most variation. Some firms take ownership of the patent or a share of what it earns and then assert it. Some sell research reports and stop. Some run outreach. Ask three questions of any firm that uses the label: do you take title, do you assert, and what exactly do I receive, by name, at the end?
- Does: product definition, use-case and buyer research, validation with buyers, licensee ladders, outreach, deal management alongside counsel.
- Will not do, if it is the kind that keeps your title: assert the patent, take ownership, or give legal opinions.
What about monetization firms, analytics vendors, and marketplaces?
They are three more categories owners meet. Monetization firms usually acquire patents or a share of their proceeds and often enforce them; analytics vendors sell evidence-of-use reports and claim charts; marketplaces list patents and wait for buyers to find them.
- Monetization firms: want large portfolios, often want title, and many campaigns end in assertion. Not a fit for an owner who wants to keep the patent and avoid litigation.
- Analytics and evidence-of-use vendors: produce the research and the charts, then hand over the report. Useful inputs, and they belong under counsel's direction.
- Marketplaces: list the patent for buyers already searching. Passive by design, and rarely the place a security or identity buyer looks.
And invention promotion firms?
Invention promotion firms sell services to individual inventors, often marketing and submission packages, and the category carries a long record of complaints and federal enforcement. Federal law requires specific written disclosures from them, and the USPTO publishes complaints against them.
We include the category because owners searching for help with a patent meet these firms first, and because the vocabulary overlaps. A firm that promises your idea will make money, or that asks for payment before saying what you will receive, is telling you which category it is in.
Sourced facts
Under the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999, the USPTO publishes complaints against invention promoters and the promoters' responses in a public forum. It does not investigate the complaints.
Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Scam Prevention. Checked .
What should you ask before you hire any of them?
Ask every firm the same five questions, in writing, before you sign anything: what you will receive by name, who will do the work, whether they take title or a share of the patent, whether they assert, and how they work with your counsel. The answers sort the categories faster than any label.
A firm that answers all five plainly, before you ask twice, is usually worth a conversation whatever it calls itself. A firm that will not say what you receive until after you pay is telling you something important.
- What exactly will I receive, by name, and when?
- Who will do the work, and what have they done in this technology?
- Do you take title to the patent, an assignment, or a share of what it earns?
- Do you assert patents, or recommend that clients do?
- How will you work with my patent counsel, and what will you send them?
What does a typical path through these categories look like?
For a single granted patent with real engineering behind it, the usual path runs from counsel at grant, to commercial work that defines the product and finds the buyers, to outreach and a deal, with counsel closing. A broker enters only if a sale to a wide buyer network becomes the goal.
An illustrative case, invented for this page and describing no client: suppose a small company holds a granted patent on a method of detecting tampered sensor readings in industrial controllers. Its counsel prosecuted the patent and docketed the maintenance dates. Nobody in the company can explain the product to a buyer, so the first commercial work would be a product definition. Suppose that work finds several use cases with plausible buyers, one of them in a category of equipment makers the company will never sell to. The company could license that field and keep its own market. No broker would be needed, because the goal is a licensing program, not a sale.
Change one fact and the path changes. If the same company had held a family of patents with clear evidence that products in the market already practice them, and had wanted to exit the field entirely, a broker's network would have been the right tool from the start.
Which one do you need?
Match the help to the job. If you want a sale and hold a family with evidence of use, talk to brokers. If you need a valuation or a strategy, a consultant. If you need a product someone can pitch, a buyer who will pay, or someone to run the licensing outreach while you keep the patent, a commercialization firm. Keep counsel in every case.
- No product anyone outside engineering can explain: commercialization firm first.
- A product, and no answer on who pays: commercialization firm.
- Shipping the technology, and the claims reach other fields: commercialization firm, with counsel on the license structures.
- A family with evidence of use, and a sale is the goal: broker.
- A dispute, an opinion, or a filing: patent counsel.
Questions we hear
Is a patent licensing consultant the same as a broker?
No. A broker sells patents and is usually paid on the sale; a consultant advises, usually per project or on retainer. Some firms do both, which is why it is worth asking what a firm will deliver and how it is engaged.
Can a patent attorney find licensees for me?
Some do, especially in firms with licensing practices. Many prefer to keep to the legal work and refer the commercial work out, which keeps their advice independent.
Do I need a commercialization firm if I have a good patent attorney?
Only if the open question is commercial. If you already know the product, the buyer, and the deal you want, your counsel may be all you need.
What is the difference between a patent commercialization firm and an invention promotion firm?
A commercialization firm works for owners of granted patents and delivers named written work, such as a product definition or a licensee ladder, with counsel involved. Invention promotion firms sell to individual inventors, often marketing and submission packages, and are subject to federal disclosure rules because of the category's history.
Where Patenture fits
Patenture is a commercialization firm for security, identity, and trust technology. We define the product from the patent, find who pays and why, validate the answer with the people who would buy it, and get you into the room. We do not assert patents and we do not give legal opinions; patent counsel drafts and closes every license and sale. If you are not sure which door you are at, a short call is the fastest way to find out.
By Mike Dayton. Published . Updated .
Every engagement starts with a mutual NDA and a written data-handling annex your counsel can review before intake. How confidentiality works.
Patenture is not a law firm. The claim explainer and the counsel question list are commercial analysis; claim construction, validity, and prosecution strategy stay with your patent counsel, whose access is a condition of the engagement.
Related guides
Why did the patent brokers not call back? The single-patent problem and what works instead
How brokers screen, why most listed packages never sell, and what to do when you already know who needs the patent.
Updated Read the guideFor patent attorneys: what do you say when a client asks how to make money from a granted patent?
For counsel: the questions to ask a client after grant, when to refer the commercial work, and how to keep the referral clean.
Updated Read the guidePatent to product: what is a product read, and how does it differ from invention promotion?
What a written product read delivers, what it is not, and how to tell it apart from invention promotion.
Updated Read the guide